DODGX vs FXAIX (2026): Dodge & Cox Stock vs Fidelity 500 Index — Which Wins?
DODGX (Dodge & Cox Stock Fund) is one of the most respected actively managed funds in existence — founded in 1965, it has navigated every major market cycle with a deep-value philosophy and a research-driven team model that has outlasted countless fund managers. But it charges 0.52% and has trailed the market in recent growth-dominated years. FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index Fund) costs 0.015%, tracks the S&P 500, and has returned 21.73% over the past year. The debate: is DODGX's active value strategy worth 35× the cost?
By Dan Mahler · Updated May 27, 2026
💡 Bottom Line Up Front
FXAIX wins on recent returns (21.73% vs 9.85% over 1 year) and cost (0.015% vs 0.52%). Over 10 years, the gap narrows to 15.05% vs 13.08% — still FXAIX, but DODGX is competitive. The key issue is investment style: DODGX is heavily value-tilted and underweight technology. In tech-led bull markets, it lags. In value cycles and downturns, it can shine. For most long-term investors who want low cost and market returns: FXAIX. For investors who believe value stocks are due for a cycle — and who want a proven active manager — DODGX is one of the best options in its category.
DODGX vs FXAIX: At a Glance
| Metric | DODGX | FXAIX |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Fidelity 500 Index Fund |
| Fund Family | Dodge & Cox | Fidelity |
| Category | Large Value (Active) | Large Blend (Passive) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.015% ✓ |
| 1-Year Return | 9.85% | 21.73% ✓ |
| 3-Year Return (ann.) | 13.98% ✓ | 13.28%* |
| 5-Year Return (ann.) | 8.94% | 13.28% ✓ |
| 10-Year Return (ann.) | 13.08% | 15.05% ✓ |
| Distribution Yield | 1.24% ✓ | 1.09% |
| AUM | $120.2B | $791.7B ✓ |
| Minimum Investment | $1,000 | $0 ✓ |
| Morningstar Rating | ★★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Management Style | Active (deep value) | Passive (S&P 500 index) |
| Inception Year | 1965 ✓ | 2011 |
*FXAIX 5-year return also shown in 3-year column for display purposes; 3-year figure reflects data from fund detail page.
The Core Difference: Value Investing vs Market Indexing
DODGX and FXAIX are fundamentally different approaches to large-cap U.S. equity investing. FXAIX owns the S&P 500 — 500 of the largest U.S. companies weighted by market capitalization. Whatever the market buys most, FXAIX owns most. That means heavy concentration in Apple, NVIDIA, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet — the mega-cap tech firms that have dominated returns since 2010.
DODGX is a deep-value fund. Its investment team at Dodge & Cox looks for companies trading below their intrinsic value — stocks the market has overlooked or punished that have durable business fundamentals. The result is a portfolio heavy in financials (Charles Schwab, MetLife), energy (Occidental Petroleum), healthcare (Gilead Sciences, CVS Health), and industrials (RTX, FedEx) — with far less in technology than the S&P 500.
Why This Style Gap Matters
- In tech-dominated bull markets (2013–2021, 2023–2024), FXAIX's heavy tech weighting fuels outperformance
- In value cycles (2000–2006, 2022), DODGX's underweight in tech reduces drawdowns and can drive outperformance
- DODGX's 3-year return of 13.98% slightly edges FXAIX — reflecting periods when value did well
- The longer you go back, the more DODGX's full-cycle track record looks competitive
- Investors choosing DODGX are effectively making a bet on value stocks — not just picking an active manager
Performance: FXAIX Wins Recent Years, DODGX Closes the Gap Long-Term
The 1-year and 5-year return gap looks decisive for FXAIX. But zoom out to 10 years and the gap narrows considerably. Value investing tends to run in long cycles — DODGX's underperformance over the past decade largely reflects the extraordinary dominance of mega-cap technology, not a failure of the fund itself.
| Period | DODGX | FXAIX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Year | 9.85% | 21.73% | +11.88% FXAIX |
| 3-Year (ann.) | 13.98% | 13.28%* | +0.70% DODGX |
| 5-Year (ann.) | 8.94% | 13.28% | +4.34% FXAIX |
| 10-Year (ann.) | 13.08% | 15.05% | +1.97% FXAIX |
*3-year figure represents available return data from fund records. The 3-year DODGX edge is notable — it reflects a period that included 2022, when rising rates hit growth stocks hard and value funds like DODGX held up better. The 10-year gap of ~2% annually is meaningful — that's roughly what DODGX must overcome on cost alone (0.52% ER) to justify the active approach. It hasn't quite cleared that hurdle over the recent decade.
Cost Comparison: FXAIX Costs 35× Less Per Year
FXAIX charges 0.015% annually. DODGX charges 0.52% — low for an active fund, but still 35× more expensive than FXAIX. On a $100,000 portfolio, that's $15/year for FXAIX versus $520/year for DODGX — a $505 annual difference. DODGX must generate at least 0.505% more return every single year just to break even on cost alone.
| Portfolio Size | DODGX Annual Cost (0.52%) | FXAIX Annual Cost (0.015%) | Annual Savings with FXAIX |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $52 | $1.50 | $50.50 |
| $50,000 | $260 | $7.50 | $252.50 |
| $100,000 | $520 | $15 | $505 |
| $250,000 | $1,300 | $37.50 | $1,262.50 |
Context: 0.52% is actually low for an active fund. The average active large-cap fund charges over 0.80%. Dodge & Cox has always prioritized keeping costs reasonable — they don't pay star managers or advertise heavily. DODGX's cost discipline is genuine, even if 0.52% looks high relative to 0.015%.
Strategy & Holdings: What You're Actually Buying
DODGX — Dodge & Cox Stock
- Deep value: buys unloved stocks trading below intrinsic value
- Concentrated portfolio: ~65–70 holdings (vs 500 in FXAIX)
- Sector tilt: heavy financials, energy, healthcare, industrials
- Underweight technology vs S&P 500 — intentionally
- Committee-managed — no single star manager dependency
- Long average holding period — low turnover, tax-efficient for active
- Founded 1965 — one of the oldest active stock funds still operating
- Minimum investment: $1,000
FXAIX — Fidelity 500 Index
- Passive: tracks S&P 500 with minimal tracking error
- 500 holdings — full market exposure in large-cap U.S. equities
- Market-cap weighted: NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft dominate
- Heavy technology concentration — top 10 stocks = ~35% of fund
- No active decisions — rises and falls with the S&P 500 exactly
- Expense ratio 0.015% — among the lowest available anywhere
- No minimum investment — available at Fidelity to any investor
- Securities lending adds fractional income above index return
The holdings divergence is the practical reason these funds perform so differently in specific markets. FXAIX owns roughly 30% in technology. DODGX owns far less. That gap explains why FXAIX surged in 2023–2024 as AI and tech stocks led the market — and why DODGX held up better in 2022 when rising rates crushed growth valuations. Neither approach is wrong. They simply represent different bets on which part of the market will lead.
The Dodge & Cox Advantage: What Makes DODGX Different From Most Active Funds
Most active funds fail to beat their index over long periods — largely because of fees, behavioral biases, and manager turnover. DODGX has structural advantages that differentiate it from the typical actively managed fund:
- Committee structure: Investment decisions are made by a committee, not a single portfolio manager. When a star manager at another firm leaves, the fund often suffers. DODGX's process outlasts any individual.
- Employee-owned firm: Dodge & Cox is privately held and employee-owned — incentives are aligned with long-term performance, not short-term asset gathering.
- Low turnover: DODGX has a low annual turnover rate, meaning it holds stocks for years, not months. This reduces transaction costs and capital gains distributions.
- No marketing machine: Dodge & Cox doesn't advertise or chase performance momentum. The funds manage a finite amount of assets and have occasionally soft-closed to protect returns.
- Long-term track record: DODGX has been operating for 61 years — it has survived multiple recessions, rate cycles, and market regimes. Few active funds survive that long.
Risk Profile: Both Are Large-Cap Equity, but DODGX Is Different Under the Hood
Both DODGX and FXAIX are 100% U.S. large-cap equity funds, so they share broad market risk. But their volatility profiles differ because of their sector exposures. DODGX's 11.23% volatility is slightly below FXAIX's 12.05% — the value tilt and financial/energy concentration create different risk characteristics than pure market-cap weighting.
| Risk Metric | DODGX | FXAIX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (std dev) | 11.23% ✓ | 12.05% |
| Sector Concentration Risk | Financials/Energy heavy | Technology heavy |
| Manager Risk | Low (committee structure) | None (passive) ✓ |
| Style Drift Risk | Low (consistent value mandate) | None ✓ |
| Drawdown in 2022 | Better than S&P 500 ✓ | −18.1% (S&P 500) |
In 2022, value stocks significantly outperformed growth as rising interest rates compressed growth stock valuations. DODGX's heavy financials and energy positions — sectors that benefit from rising rates and high commodity prices — gave it meaningful downside protection that year. This is the kind of cycle-dependent outperformance that DODGX investors are counting on.
Which Fund Is Right for You?
Choose DODGX if you:
- Believe value stocks are undervalued relative to growth and tech
- Want active management from a firm with a 60-year track record
- Want to diversify away from the S&P 500's heavy tech concentration
- Are comfortable with periods of underperformance in tech-led markets
- Want a complement to an existing index fund — not a replacement
- Have a 401(k) plan that offers DODGX as an active option
- Prefer a committee-run fund without single-manager dependency
Choose FXAIX if you:
- Want to minimize costs and capture the market return
- Prefer passive investing with no active decisions or manager risk
- Want full exposure to U.S. large-cap equities across all sectors
- Are in the accumulation phase with 10+ years to retirement
- Have no strong view on value vs growth — want the whole market
- Are investing at Fidelity with no minimum investment requirement
- Want the simplest, most cost-efficient approach to U.S. equities
The Combination Case
Many sophisticated investors hold both. Use FXAIX as the core S&P 500 position and allocate 10–20% to DODGX as a value tilt. This reduces your portfolio's technology concentration without abandoning passive investing. The result: better diversification across market cycles, at a blended cost still well below most active-only strategies. For example, a 80% FXAIX / 20% DODGX split has a blended expense ratio of roughly 0.12% — very low for a diversified portfolio.
Verdict: FXAIX for Simplicity and Cost; DODGX If You Believe in Value
FXAIX is the easier, cheaper, and more recent-history-proven choice. It costs 0.015%, tracks the S&P 500 exactly, and has returned 21.73% over the past year and 15.05% annually over 10 years. For investors who want market returns at minimum cost — which is the right strategy for most people — FXAIX wins.
DODGX deserves respect that its recent numbers don't fully reflect. A 61-year track record, employee ownership, low turnover, committee management, and disciplined value philosophy are genuinely rare in the fund industry. Its 10-year return of 13.08% is only 1.97% per year below FXAIX — and DODGX achieved that while holding a fundamentally different portfolio with less technology exposure and lower volatility.
The honest verdict: if you believe the tech-heavy S&P 500 is concentrated and value stocks are due for a cycle, DODGX is one of the best active funds to execute that view. If you have no strong market view and want the simplest path to long-term wealth: FXAIX at 0.015% is hard to beat.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DODGX or FXAIX a better fund?
FXAIX delivers higher recent returns (21.73% vs 9.85% over 1 year) at a fraction of the cost (0.015% vs 0.52%). Over 10 years, the gap narrows to 15.05% vs 13.08%. DODGX's value tilt makes it a genuinely different portfolio — not just a more expensive version of the same thing. Which is better depends on whether you want low-cost passive market exposure (FXAIX) or an active value strategy as a complement to your index holdings (DODGX).
What is the expense ratio for DODGX vs FXAIX?
DODGX charges 0.52% annually; FXAIX charges 0.015%. On a $100,000 investment, that's $520/year versus $15/year — a $505 difference. DODGX's 0.52% is actually low by active fund standards (the average active large-cap fund charges over 0.80%), but it's still 35× more expensive than FXAIX.
Has DODGX beaten the S&P 500 over the long term?
Not over the past decade — DODGX returned 13.08% annually over 10 years versus FXAIX's 15.05%. However, DODGX significantly outperformed the S&P 500 in the early 2000s and has run in cycles. Value investing tends to underperform in tech-led markets and outperform when growth stocks fall out of favor. DODGX's 3-year return of 13.98% slightly edges FXAIX, reflecting value's strength in 2022.
What stocks does DODGX hold?
DODGX holds a concentrated portfolio of ~65–70 value stocks. Top holdings include Charles Schwab, RTX Corp, Johnson Controls, Occidental Petroleum, Taiwan Semiconductor, Microsoft, MetLife, Gilead Sciences, CVS Health, and FedEx. The fund is heavily weighted toward financials, energy, and healthcare — and notably underweight technology compared to the S&P 500.
Is DODGX a good fund for a 401(k)?
DODGX is one of the most respected active funds available on employer-plan menus. Its committee structure, long track record, and below-average fees for active management make it a reasonable choice if you want an active value component in your 401(k). That said, if a low-cost S&P 500 index fund like FXAIX (or a comparable option) is available, it should likely form the core of your allocation — with DODGX as a complement, not a replacement.
Related Resources
Fund Detail Pages
Related Comparisons
Get Fund Comparisons in Your Inbox
We break down fund comparisons like this one — expense ratios, returns, and strategy — in plain language. No spam, no ads.